|
||||
|
|
Posting #9 – The Reality of the Registry; (A’s Story)
Dear Virginia Lawmakers, In our November 1, 2008 e-mail or letter to you, titled Hate Crimes and Intimidation Tactics, RSOL of Virginia highlighted three points.
Any person or persons committing a crime against a person listed on the registry solely due to the listing shall be punishable to the full extent of the law under “Hate Crimes”. Contrary to popular belief among lawmakers there is indeed hardship related to being listed on a sex offender registry. The below e-mail was forwarded to us last night, he’s a single father: Date: Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:21 PM Thanks again for checking on me, A. How many hard working law abiding citizens have lost their jobs, homes and families because of meddling co-workers that have an axe to grind that has nothing to do with the person they are destroying? More than we’ll ever know. This is a prime example of why employment information should not be posted for public view. As long as a registered offender submits their employment information to the State Police and the police confirm the location and position do not violate any location restrictions that should be sufficient. I will end this letter with a recent article that makes this same point. RSOL of Virginia will ask you again. During the 2009 General Assembly add registered sex offenders to the list of people included in Hate Crimes and remove all employer information from the Virginia Sex Offender registry. Article- October 20, 2008 The recent slayings of two convicted sex offenders listed on Maine’s online sex offender database pose serious questions about the consequences of registry laws. But crime experts and defense attorneys doubt whether a considerate national debate on the issue is possible.
We look forward to your response. RSOL of Virginia Organizers
|
|||